The power sector of Pakistan is a mess and requires comprehensive and swift governance and policy reforms, said the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) in a wide-ranging study titled ‘Pitfalls in Power Sector of Pakistan: Accumulation of Circular Debt – Causes, Consequences, and Way Forward’.
Some of these include an audit of Independent Power Producers (IPPs), the development of business models to boost renewable energy, liberalization of the energy market through deregulation and privatization, renegotiations of generation tariffs for independent power producers, segregation and deregulation of the administrative and operational activities of the distribution companies leading towards public-private partnership, and implementation of accelerated reforms for modernization.
These and several other viable policy options and practical solutions for the sustainable development of the sector were put forward in the study.
The research report on the constraints and shortcomings of the power sector is particularly focused on identifying the factors contributing to the exponential increase in circular debt, which has now reached Rs. 4 trillion, and providing doable solutions.
The power sector has long been stifled by numerous issues that hamper not only sustainable development but also the efficient progression and strategic growth of this vital sector. As a result, Pakistan has been severely affected by the energy crisis, resulting in a negative impact on the overall economy.
Why is Circular Debt Rising?
Among the factors contributing to the rise in circular debt is dependence on expensive imported fuels, high generation costs from thermal sources, unfavorable rupee-to-dollar parity, poor governance, and policy lapses, regulatory issues, inadequate recovery of distribution companies’ revenues, financial sustainability issues, capacity charges, aging infrastructure, and line losses. The rise in circular debt requires regular tariff hikes to maintain proper cash flow for public and private entities and this affects the energy affordability of the consumers.
Additionally, the vertically integrated market of Pakistan’s power sector is partially monopolized, where state institutions play a dominant role. This structure results in non-existent competition between the entities. Currently, 78 IPPs are operating in Pakistan and are majorly based on imported fuel.
The country’s total installed capacity is 40,813 MW, excluding K-Electric. The peak demand witnessed in the system during FY2021-22 was 28,253 MW. However, the transmission capacity of the electricity infrastructure has remained stagnant at 23,000 MW. On the other hand, transmission, and distribution losses of the state-owned distribution companies in FY2021-22 amounted to over 17 percent as against the 13 percent target determined by NEPRA.
So, even with surplus electricity, the consumers face load shedding despite paying higher electricity rates because of obsolete and deficient transmission and distribution systems. In this scenario, public-private partnership is the way forward to extricate the power sector from this quagmire. This also requires new investments in the transmission and distribution system and a shift to the latest technology to reduce line losses. A major reason for the burden on consumers is the obsolete and less efficient power transmission system; therefore, power transmission must be made an investment priority area, along with energy transition and digitization.
Solutions
To overcome the issue of circular debt, the most judicial approach requires a thorough audit of all the IPPs, which will help in counter check of set-up cost, actual fuel usage, heat rates, Oand M component of the tariff, interest during construction (IDC), and net annual plant capacity (NAPC) factor of IPPs. These factors have an immense impact on the payments being made to IPPs, but at the time of installation, tariff settlement based on cost plus tariff regime, and quarterly adjustments of the capacity components, are factors not accounted for audit or assessment.
In summary, the report also suggests the following:
Short-Term Solutions
Emphasis on dual contracts
Division of DISCOs into sub-units to help lower the burden of incapacities of DISCOs
Mini-grids based rural electrification (biomass, solar, etc)
Medium and Long-Term Solutions
Promotion of Renewable Energy-Based Distributed Generation
Development of business models which will help grant a swift uptake of low-cost and clean energy integration with the grid
Provision of incentives in tariff structure
Utility-Scale Renewable Energy Projects
Competitive bidding of renewable power plants
Hybrid renewable energy projects
Liberalization of the Energy Market
Capacity Building for Indigenousness
Source: Pro Pakistani
